THE WAVES
  • Home
  • News
    • Recent Updates
    • Weekly Newsletter
    • Monthly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Topics
    • Technology
      • Internet
      • AR/VR & Digital twins
      • Robotics
      • AI & Data Analytics
      • IoT & Wearable
      • Blockchain
      • Computing
      • Sensors & Perception
      • 3D Printing
      • Energy Tech
      • Space
      • Gadgets
    • Transformation
      • Education
      • Health
      • Transportation
      • Farming
      • Energy
      • Security
      • Mining & Blue Economy
      • Food & Living
      • Communication
      • Entertainment
      • Manufacturing
      • Work & Management
      • Public Service
    • Startups
      • Culture
      • Country
      • New Entry
      • Accelerators
      • Incubators
      • Death Valley
      • Investments
      • Exit & IPO
      • Valuation & Financing
      • Idea & IP
    • Education & Research
      • School
      • University
      • Academic Research
      • Corporate Research
      • Public-funded Research
      • Economics of Innovation
      • Growth Economics
      • Training
      • Publications
      • Patents & IP
    • Industry 4.0
      • Future of Work
      • Sustainable Development
      • Smart Manufacturing
      • Job Transformation
      • Industry Transformation
      • Competition & Monopoly
      • National Response
      • Education & Skills
      • Social Change
    • Investment & Review
      • Public
      • Corporate
      • Venture Capital
      • Capital Market
      • Philanthropy
      • Personality
  • Strategy
    • Value Proposition
      • Product
      • Process
      • Sustainability Goals
      • Business Model
      • Complementary
      • Externality
    • Innovation
      • Disruptive Innovation
      • Incremented Innovation
      • Sustaining
      • Schumpeter’s Creative Destruction
      • Redesign for Winning
    • Competition
      • Leading
      • Following
      • Blue Ocean
      • Monopolisation
      • Porter’s Five Forces
      • Business Cycle
    • Intangible Assets
      • Human Capital
      • R&D Management
      • Tripple Helix
      • Intellectual Property
      • Productive Knowledge
      • Technology Managment
    • Competence
      • Organization Agility
      • Innovation Culture
      • Infrastructure
      • R&D facility
      • Great by Choice
      • Build to Last
      • Good to Great
    • Technology Acquisition
      • Scientific discovery
      • Invention
      • Fusion
      • Adaptation & Refinement
      • Licensing
      • Start-up acquisition
  • Policy
    • Technology Development
    • Industry
    • Innovation Diffusion
    • Jobs, Privacy & Security
    • Regulation & Law
    • Sustainability
    • Equity & Inclusiveness
    • Climate Change
    • Environment
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
  • Megatrends
    • Individual Preferences
    • Planet and Society
    • Technology
    • Political Economy
    • Market Power & Monopoly
    • Globalisation
    • Schumpeter’s creative destruction
    • Startups & VC
    • Human Role in Work
    • Value of Natural Resources
    • Patents & Ideas for Redesign
  • Publication
    • Magazine
    • Books
    • Reports
    • White Papers
    • Journals
THE WAVES In-depth investigation on Technology, Society, and Policy dynamics for interpreting the past as well as present, and predicting the future so that success rate of pursuing ideas, start-ups, and innovation economy increases.

Technology, Society and Policy

THE WAVES
  • Home
  • News
    • Recent Updates
    • Weekly Newsletter
    • Monthly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Topics
    • Technology
      • Internet
      • AR/VR & Digital twins
      • Robotics
      • AI & Data Analytics
      • IoT & Wearable
      • Blockchain
      • Computing
      • Sensors & Perception
      • 3D Printing
      • Energy Tech
      • Space
      • Gadgets
    • Transformation
      • Education
      • Health
      • Transportation
      • Farming
      • Energy
      • Security
      • Mining & Blue Economy
      • Food & Living
      • Communication
      • Entertainment
      • Manufacturing
      • Work & Management
      • Public Service
    • Startups
      • Culture
      • Country
      • New Entry
      • Accelerators
      • Incubators
      • Death Valley
      • Investments
      • Exit & IPO
      • Valuation & Financing
      • Idea & IP
    • Education & Research
      • School
      • University
      • Academic Research
      • Corporate Research
      • Public-funded Research
      • Economics of Innovation
      • Growth Economics
      • Training
      • Publications
      • Patents & IP
    • Industry 4.0
      • Future of Work
      • Sustainable Development
      • Smart Manufacturing
      • Job Transformation
      • Industry Transformation
      • Competition & Monopoly
      • National Response
      • Education & Skills
      • Social Change
    • Investment & Review
      • Public
      • Corporate
      • Venture Capital
      • Capital Market
      • Philanthropy
      • Personality
  • Strategy
    • Value Proposition
      • Product
      • Process
      • Sustainability Goals
      • Business Model
      • Complementary
      • Externality
    • Innovation
      • Disruptive Innovation
      • Incremented Innovation
      • Sustaining
      • Schumpeter’s Creative Destruction
      • Redesign for Winning
    • Competition
      • Leading
      • Following
      • Blue Ocean
      • Monopolisation
      • Porter’s Five Forces
      • Business Cycle
    • Intangible Assets
      • Human Capital
      • R&D Management
      • Tripple Helix
      • Intellectual Property
      • Productive Knowledge
      • Technology Managment
    • Competence
      • Organization Agility
      • Innovation Culture
      • Infrastructure
      • R&D facility
      • Great by Choice
      • Build to Last
      • Good to Great
    • Technology Acquisition
      • Scientific discovery
      • Invention
      • Fusion
      • Adaptation & Refinement
      • Licensing
      • Start-up acquisition
  • Policy
    • Technology Development
    • Industry
    • Innovation Diffusion
    • Jobs, Privacy & Security
    • Regulation & Law
    • Sustainability
    • Equity & Inclusiveness
    • Climate Change
    • Environment
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
  • Megatrends
    • Individual Preferences
    • Planet and Society
    • Technology
    • Political Economy
    • Market Power & Monopoly
    • Globalisation
    • Schumpeter’s creative destruction
    • Startups & VC
    • Human Role in Work
    • Value of Natural Resources
    • Patents & Ideas for Redesign
  • Publication
    • Magazine
    • Books
    • Reports
    • White Papers
    • Journals

  • Blue Ocean
  • Corporate Research
  • Disruptive Innovation
  • Economics of Innovation
  • Editor's Pick
  • Innovation Diffusion
  • Innovation History
  • Patents & IP
  • Technology History

Invention, Evolution and Creative Destruction of Television

  • Rokon Zaman
  • July 8, 2020
Invention, Evolution and Creative Destruction of Television has been driven by the uprising of disruptive technologies, causing disruptions to incumbent
The journey of invention and evolution of Television is a trail of uprising of disruptive technologies causing creative destructions

Television is a common household item. It delivers news, entertains us, and strengthens family bonding. Due to its fascinating role, particularly among the children, who has invented TV is a common question. How has Television evolved also raises curiosity. As a matter of fact, there is no single inventor. Many inventors have contributed, often working separately. Moreover, the idea of Television has fueled profit-making opportunities. The relentless journey of perfection also kept technology core changing; consequentially fueling the evolution of this remarkable invention. The uprising of the technology core also caused creative destruction. The journey of invention and evolution of Television offers us a lesson about how competition in profiting from ideas fuels the evolution of inventions. Hence, it’s worth looking into the unfolding dynamics of invention, evolution, and creative destruction of Television.     

Ideas and Praxis underpinning the Invention of TV 

To begin with, let’s ask a couple of questions. Which triggered the invention of TV? Or, how did people get the inspiration for inventing TV? Unlike other living things, human beings have an inherent creative urge to get jobs done better with ideas. Ancient philosophical writings term it as praxis. Visual observation is one of the fascinating experiences. But in order to experience it, physical presence in the close vicinity is required. In many situations, it is not a feasible option. As a result, this desire remained unmet. Hence, human beings were looking for ideas to make it happen from a distance. This inherent urge to get visual experience from a distance kept driving the creative process of human beings.

At last, they succeeded with the idea of Television. However, it emerged in a very primitive form. Subsequently, the long journey of evolution of TV began. Indeed, it has been a very long journey lasting over more than a century. 

The precursor to Television invention 

Prior to the invention of TV, the journey of transmission of raster images began. Alexander Bain introduced the facsimile machine from 1843 to 1846. However, it used mechanical raster scanning techniques for the transmission of still images by wire. In 1873, Willoughby Smith discovered the photoconductivity of the element Selenium. Subsequently, this scientific discovery led to the development of the Selenium cell phototube. As the resistance of Selenium varies with the intensity of incident light, this technology succeeded in transferring incident optical information into the variation of current. Later on, it became the core technology for the development of mechanical Television.  

Invention emerged as a mechanical Television 

In 1884, a 23-year-old German student Paul Julius Gottlieb Nipkow proposed and patented the Nipkow disk. It’s a spinning disk with a spiral pattern of holes in it. Each hole scanned a line of the image. In 1900, Constantin Perskyi coined the term television and spelled out down the concept based on existing electromechanical technologies, including the work of Nipkow and others. It was a theoretical concept, but this work was important nevertheless. Georges Rignoux and A. Fournier, in Paris in 1909, demonstrated proof-of-concept by clearly transmitting individual letters of the alphabet as an 8×8 pixel image. By the 1920s, amplification made Television practical. This inspired Scottish inventor John Logie Baird to develop his prototype video systems employing the Nipkow disk. With the support of his businessman friend, Mr. Baird ventured int the journey of commercialization of Television. Subsequently, the refinement of mechanical scanning technology kept progressing. 

However, Nipkow disk-based mechanical scanning technology reached saturation upon reaching 48 lines. Meanwhile, in the Soviet Union, Léon Theremin had been developing a mirror drum-based television reaching the success of transmission of an image of 100 lines by 1927. In the USA in 1925, Charles Francis Jenkins demonstrated the synchronized transmission of silhouette pictures based on his article “Motion Pictures by Wireless” published in 1913. Subsequently, he got U.S. patent for Transmitting Pictures over Wireless network on June 30, 1925. Simultaneously, Researchers at Bell laboratories also became active and succeeded in making remarkable demonstrations. At last, all these demonstrations culminated in the establishment of world’s first television station in 1928.

Saturation of mechanical technologies and uprising of electronics started a new era

In the meantime, on December 25, 1925 in Japan, Kenjiro Takayanagi demonstrated a television system using Nipkow disk scanner and CRT display. To sum up the first phase, inventive activities in the mechanical phase centered around four nodes. They were located in Europe, Japan, the Former Soviet Union, and the USA. Mr. Takayanagi’s invention led the Television to evolve into the electronic age.    

Television evolution entering the electronic age 

As opposed to spinning disk, the core technology of electronic Television is a cathode ray tube. In this tube, the electron beam is used to scan surface for the conversion of the optical signal into electrical ones, and vice versa. The development of cathode ray tube technology has roots into the work done by J.J. Thomson and Karl Ferdinand Braun in 1897. In 1926, Hungarian engineer Kálmán Tihanyi designed a television system utilizing fully electronic scanning and display elements. Tihanyi’s breakthroughs were incorporated in RCA’s video camera tube “iconoscope” in 1931, subsequently used in early TV cameras. Philo Farnsworth’s demonstration in 1928 for the US press is widely regarded as the first electronic television demonstration. By 1935, Japanese inventor Takayanagi had invented the first all-electronic Television.

Patent race to profit from the idea of Television

Takayanagi had invented the first all-electronic Television. Nevertheless, he did not claim a patent. In the meantime, commercial interest to profit from the idea started gaining momentum. In contrary to Mr. Takayanagi, American company RCA became very serious in acquiring patents as a preparation to profit from the TV innovations. RCA bought both patents of TV signal transmission and reception, based on work done by Kálmán Tinhanyi. Meanwhile, while working for Westinghouse Electric in 1923, Vladimir Zworykin was also experimenting with the cathode ray tube to create and show images. Although, Zworykin’s imaging tube never got beyond the laboratory stage, but RCA acquired the Westinghouse patent. RCA also entered into a patent lawsuit against Farnsworth. After a long court battle, 1939, RCA agreed to pay Farnsworth US$1 million over a ten-year period, in addition to license payments, to use Farnsworth’s patents. 

Upon acquiring key patents, RCA vigorously engaged in the production of electronic Television with the demonstration of an all-electronic television system in 1939. RCA invested over $50 million for the development of electronic television. It’s R&D effort was led by Russian-born scientist Vladimir Kosma Zworykin. RCA began the commercial journey by selling television sets with 5 by 12 in (12.7 by 25.4 cm) picture tubes. It was a primitive product. Nevertheless, it was the beginning of a new era of the human race.

Television experienced extreme high diffusion rate

The debut of TV created so much excitement among the consumers that the number of television sets in use rose from 6,000 in 1946 to some 12 million by 1951. The penetration rate of black and white Television in American homes was far faster than any other previous invention. By 1955, half of all U.S. homes had one. This rapid diffusion created a significant fortune for RCA. The mass-produced RCA 630-TS TV set was 95-pound tabletop machine. It was introduced in 1946 with an initial selling price of $435. RCA emerged as dominant TV maker of the world with the reputation that RCA chief David Sarnoff was proud to be called the “Father of Television,” 

Emergence of the Color Television

The experimentation of color TV started in the first decade of the 20th century. Patents on Color TV concepts were issued in Germany on March 31 in1908, in Britain on April 1 in 1908, in France in 1910, and also in Russia in 1910. Along with the development of mechanical TV, John Logie Baird demonstrated the world’s first color transmission on July 3, 1928, using scanning discs with three spirals of apertures, both at the transmitting and receiving ends. Unfortunately, his work on Telechrome system ended with demise in 1946. Mexican inventor Guillermo González Camarena experimented TV in the 1930s, which led to a patent for the “trichromatic field sequential system” color television in 1940.

American company CBS began experimental color field tests using film as early as August 28, 1940, and live cameras by November 12. RCA’s NBC made its first field test of color television on February 20, 1941. Upon perfection of 3 electron gun-based concept and bandwidth conserving image representation technique, all-electronic color TV was introduced in the U.S. in 1953. Initial price of $1,295 dollars, in today’s dollars that would probably work out to be in the range of more than 10-thousand dollars, was the major barrier to the adoption. 

 Disruptive innovation and the emergence of Sony as a dominant player 

Invention, Evolution, and Creative Destruction of Television has been driven by the uprising of disruptive technologies, causing disruptions to incumbents. Despite the fact that Japanese inventor Kenjiro Takayanagi’s perfected first electronic TV in 1935, the initial phase of profit-making opportunity was realized by American firms like RCA. The havoc created by World War II and patent-holding of electronic TV by RCA were among several barriers for Japanese to take a slice of this lucrative pie. The invention of Transistor in 1947 silently opened a door for new entrants. Sony took the advantage. While RCA was overlooking the primitive emergence of Transistor, Sony was desperate to keep refining it. This refinement practice reached very deep. Subsequently, this led to a winning prize by one of Sony’s R&D team members. This journey of continuous advancement of Transistor led to Sony’s successes in Radio in the 1960s, which was immediately followed by Television.

 Soon after it, Sony took over the dominance of RCA and became the world’s largest TV maker. It maintained this position till the recent past, before Samsung took over. Nevertheless, Sony is still the leader in the premium market segment of TV. Moreover, Sony’s uprising riding on the next wave of disruptive technology led to the destruction of RCA.    

Digital, and Flat Screen, 3D and Smart TVs

Despite the fact that the invention of Television was a big success, Technology for Television kept improving. Particularly, there was an urgency on improving picture quality. Digital Transmission was brought foreword to replace analog for higher quality pictures. With the emergence of low-cost, high-performance computers, digital Television started growing the root. Ultimately, in the 1990s, digital TV became a real possibility.  Japanese companies like Sony led initiative of digital TV became practically feasible due to a major technological development, discrete cosine transform (DCT) for video compression. 

Flat screen for portable and extra large Televisions

In order to reduce weight and make the screen flat of large TVs, alternative display technology development started in the 1980s. Some of the notable ones are LCD, Plasma, and LED. The initial target application of LCD was portable Television. Unlike the development of cathode ray tube display in the early 20th century by Americans and Europeans, this new generation display technology was dominated by the Japanese. Seiko introduced the first LCD TV in 1982 as the Epson TV Watch. It was a small wrist-worn active-matrix LCD television. Shortly after that, Sharp, Citizen, and Casio followed EPSON’S footsteps. Subsequent technology progression led to the increasing popularity of LCD TVs, which led to surpassing sales of cathode ray tube televisions worldwide in 2007. 

3D and Smart Televisions

3D TV has a long history. In 1928, John Logie Baird demonstrated Stereoscopic 3D Television. However, his 3D television systems were based on electro-mechanical and cathode-ray tube techniques. There was a renewed interest of advancing 3D TVs in the 21st century. 3D-ready TV sets are those that can operate in 3D mode to recreate a stereoscopic image, with the support of HDMI port, a minimum output refresh rate of 120 Hz, and glasses.

The long journey of the evolution of Television has led to the emergence of Smart TV. Indeed, it’s a traditional television set with integrated Internet and interactive Web 2.0 features that allow users to stream music and videos, browse the internet, view photos, and enjoy on-demand streaming media. On top of it, it could also be wireless plugged into gadgets like smartphones and cameras.

Disruptive technologies driving invention, evolution and creative destruction of Television

TV as an invention, created huge excitement. Its evolution is equally impressive with the uprising of disruptive technologies causing creative destruction. The uprising of cathode ray tube (CRT)-based image formation and reception, known as full electronic TV, gave the window for RAC to enter the race to profit from TV invention. However, the uprising of electronic TV caused destruction to Baird’s mechanical TV business. On the other hand, the emergence and growth of Sony’s Transistor-based design kept making TV sets less costly, but at the cost of the market share of RCA. Subsequently, RCA lost dominance and suffered from destruction. Finally, the development of flat-screen technology like LCD, LED and Plasma have taken TV’s at a new height, causing destruction to the CRT industry. 

It’s also interesting that the journey of creative destruction driving the evolution of TV made the geographical nucleus of the TV industry dynamic. First, it moved the nucleus from Europe to America. Later on, it moved to Japan, followed by South Korea and China. Indeed, TV has a remarkable journey of creating excitement and transforming industries through waves of disruptive technologies, casing creative destruction. Will foldable screen and smartphone cause destruction to the usual appearance of TV sets?     

Furthermore, this long journey has not ended yet. On the whole, it has been a fascinating journey. It offers highly valuable lessons not only about the creative power of the human race, but also most importantly, the technology innovation dynamics in the competitive market. The profitmaking competition from ideas has been unfolding waves of disruptive technologies causing creative destruction. This dynamics has been at the core of its continued evolution for offering us increasingly better Television at decreasing cost.

Enlighten others

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like

Sony--why is it a role model for startup, innovation, and idea economy?
View Post
  • 3 min

Startup, Innovation, and Idea Economy–is Sony a role model?

Purpose of Electrical and Computer Engineering should get due focus to address the job creation for the graduates and driving economic prosperity
View Post
  • 7 min

Purpose of Electrical and Computer Engineering Education

The vulnerability of America’s technology superiority due to the possibility of scaling up of disruptive model demonstrated by Japanese companies
View Post
  • 5 min

Vulnerability of America’s Technology Superiority

1 comment

  1. Pingback: Disruptive Technology and Innovation Examples - THE WAVES

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Principles

  • Economics of Technology
  • Innovation Economics
  • Technology & Innovation Policy

History & Observations

  • Technology History
  • Innovation History
  • Strategy & Policy in retrospect
  • Entrepreneurs & Innovators
  • Startups & Corporations
  • Patents & Publications
  • Design & Redesign Thinking

About Us

  • Who we are
  • What we deliver
  • Genesis
  • Mission
  • Scope
  • Editorial & Advisory Board
THE WAVES
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Go to mobile version