THE WAVES
  • Home
  • News
    • Recent Updates
    • Weekly Newsletter
    • Monthly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Topics
    • Technology
      • Internet
      • AR/VR & Digital twins
      • Robotics
      • AI & Data Analytics
      • IoT & Wearable
      • Blockchain
      • Computing
      • Sensors & Perception
      • 3D Printing
      • Energy Tech
      • Space
      • Gadgets
    • Transformation
      • Education
      • Health
      • Transportation
      • Farming
      • Energy
      • Security
      • Mining & Blue Economy
      • Food & Living
      • Communication
      • Entertainment
      • Manufacturing
      • Work & Management
      • Public Service
    • Startups
      • Culture
      • Country
      • New Entry
      • Accelerators
      • Incubators
      • Death Valley
      • Investments
      • Exit & IPO
      • Valuation & Financing
      • Idea & IP
    • Education & Research
      • School
      • University
      • Academic Research
      • Corporate Research
      • Public-funded Research
      • Economics of Innovation
      • Growth Economics
      • Training
      • Publications
      • Patents & IP
    • Industrial Revolutions
      • Future of Work
      • Sustainable Development
      • Smart Manufacturing
      • Job Transformation
      • Industry Transformation
      • Competition & Monopoly
      • National Response
      • Education & Skills
      • Social Change
    • Investment & Review
      • Public
      • Corporate
      • Venture Capital
      • Capital Market
      • Philanthropy
      • Personality
    • Inventions
    • Automation
  • Strategy
    • Value Proposition
      • Product
      • Process
      • Sustainability Goals
      • Business Model
      • Complementary
      • Externality
    • Innovation
      • Disruptive Innovation
      • Incremented Innovation
      • Sustaining
      • Schumpeter’s Creative Destruction
      • Redesign for Winning
    • Competition
      • Leading
      • Following
      • Blue Ocean
      • Monopolisation
      • Porter’s Five Forces
      • Business Cycle
    • Intangible Assets
      • Human Capital
      • R&D Management
      • Tripple Helix
      • Intellectual Property
      • Productive Knowledge
      • Technology Managment
    • Competence
      • Organization Agility
      • Innovation Culture
      • Infrastructure
      • R&D facility
      • Great by Choice
      • Build to Last
      • Good to Great
    • Technology Acquisition
      • Scientific discovery
      • Invention
      • Fusion
      • Adaptation & Refinement
      • Licensing
      • Start-up acquisition
  • Policy
    • Technology Development
    • Industry
    • Innovation Diffusion
    • Jobs, Privacy & Security
    • Regulation & Law
    • Sustainability
    • Equity & Inclusiveness
    • Climate Change
    • Environment
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
  • Megatrends
    • Individual Preferences
    • Planet and Society
    • Technology
    • Political Economy
    • Market Power & Monopoly
    • Globalisation
    • Schumpeter’s creative destruction
    • Startups & VC
    • Human Role in Work
    • Value of Natural Resources
    • Patents & Ideas for Redesign
  • Publication
    • Magazine
    • Books
    • Reports
    • White Papers
    • Journals
THE WAVES In-depth investigation on Technology, Society, and Policy dynamics for interpreting the past as well as present, and predicting the future so that success rate of pursuing ideas, start-ups, and innovation economy increases.

Technology, Society and Policy

Winning and Losing in Reinvention Race : keeps unfolding: --making America’s innovation bucket leaky, creating prosperity out of reinvention, and turning invention successes transitory
THE WAVES
  • Home
  • News
    • Recent Updates
    • Weekly Newsletter
    • Monthly Newsletter
    • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Topics
    • Technology
      • Internet
      • AR/VR & Digital twins
      • Robotics
      • AI & Data Analytics
      • IoT & Wearable
      • Blockchain
      • Computing
      • Sensors & Perception
      • 3D Printing
      • Energy Tech
      • Space
      • Gadgets
    • Transformation
      • Education
      • Health
      • Transportation
      • Farming
      • Energy
      • Security
      • Mining & Blue Economy
      • Food & Living
      • Communication
      • Entertainment
      • Manufacturing
      • Work & Management
      • Public Service
    • Startups
      • Culture
      • Country
      • New Entry
      • Accelerators
      • Incubators
      • Death Valley
      • Investments
      • Exit & IPO
      • Valuation & Financing
      • Idea & IP
    • Education & Research
      • School
      • University
      • Academic Research
      • Corporate Research
      • Public-funded Research
      • Economics of Innovation
      • Growth Economics
      • Training
      • Publications
      • Patents & IP
    • Industrial Revolutions
      • Future of Work
      • Sustainable Development
      • Smart Manufacturing
      • Job Transformation
      • Industry Transformation
      • Competition & Monopoly
      • National Response
      • Education & Skills
      • Social Change
    • Investment & Review
      • Public
      • Corporate
      • Venture Capital
      • Capital Market
      • Philanthropy
      • Personality
    • Inventions
    • Automation
  • Strategy
    • Value Proposition
      • Product
      • Process
      • Sustainability Goals
      • Business Model
      • Complementary
      • Externality
    • Innovation
      • Disruptive Innovation
      • Incremented Innovation
      • Sustaining
      • Schumpeter’s Creative Destruction
      • Redesign for Winning
    • Competition
      • Leading
      • Following
      • Blue Ocean
      • Monopolisation
      • Porter’s Five Forces
      • Business Cycle
    • Intangible Assets
      • Human Capital
      • R&D Management
      • Tripple Helix
      • Intellectual Property
      • Productive Knowledge
      • Technology Managment
    • Competence
      • Organization Agility
      • Innovation Culture
      • Infrastructure
      • R&D facility
      • Great by Choice
      • Build to Last
      • Good to Great
    • Technology Acquisition
      • Scientific discovery
      • Invention
      • Fusion
      • Adaptation & Refinement
      • Licensing
      • Start-up acquisition
  • Policy
    • Technology Development
    • Industry
    • Innovation Diffusion
    • Jobs, Privacy & Security
    • Regulation & Law
    • Sustainability
    • Equity & Inclusiveness
    • Climate Change
    • Environment
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
  • Megatrends
    • Individual Preferences
    • Planet and Society
    • Technology
    • Political Economy
    • Market Power & Monopoly
    • Globalisation
    • Schumpeter’s creative destruction
    • Startups & VC
    • Human Role in Work
    • Value of Natural Resources
    • Patents & Ideas for Redesign
  • Publication
    • Magazine
    • Books
    • Reports
    • White Papers
    • Journals

  • Automation
  • Future of Work
  • Robotics

Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle —before causing creative destruction

  • Rokon Zaman
  • Created: July 20, 2020
  • Last updated: December 7, 2022
Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle —before causing creative destruction
As Honda failed to develop human-like innate abilities, ASIMO failed to qualify for service jobs–journey ends before causing creative destruction in service sector

The future of Work is uncertain. “Robots could take over 20 million manufacturing jobs around the world by 2030”—a recent study of the Economist shares. It’s widely believed that robotization will take away tens of millions of jobs in near future. It’s also believed that human-like robots, humanoid, will work side by the side of humans. Consequentially, they will keep growing and taking away one after another work from humans, creating increasing unemployment. Among all the robots developed to date, Honda’s ASIMO appears to be the most sophisticated. In fact, this is a symbol of Japan’s advances in robotics technology. Unfortunately, Honda stopped its further development in 2018. Consequentially, Honda’s ASIMO ends its lifecycle. What is the underlying message of this news? 

At the dawn of the fourth industrial revolution, why does the world’s most sophisticated robot, Honda’s ASIMO retire? Moreover, it does not leave either siblings or offspring. Is it the end of this species? Does it mean that we will unlikely witness the growth of the human-like robot population in our society? As Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle prematurely, there is doubt about some observations like “Latest research from the World Economic Forum forecasts that by 2025, machines will perform more current work tasks than humans, compared to 71% being performed by humans today.” In fact, humanoids have the potential to drive waves of creative destruction affecting the future of work.

ASIMO’s birth and growth—reaching adolescence  

Like human beings, technologies also have a life cycle. They are born, grow, reach adulthood, and retire. As they keep progressing to retirement, they also witness the uprising of the next waves of technologies, offering better possibilities. As the precursor to ASIMO, we observed a few past generations of humanoids. Around 1495, it was born in the sketch of Leonardo da Vinci. Subsequently, Eric was born in 1929, creating a high sensation. In the 1960s, university research laboratories started working on the idea of humanoid, giving birth to successive better versions. Consequentially, humanoid drew commercial interest, leading to Honda’s R&D program in 1986. That year Honda opened a brand-new R&D center at Saitama in Japan. Among the three flagship R&D projects, there was ASIMO. The other two projects were for fuel cell batteries and HondaJet. 

ASIMO stands for Advanced Step in Innovative Mobility. After long 14 years of R&D, ASIMO emerged in 2000. It was 130 cm tall, 54 kg humanoid. Of course, prior to the unveiling of ASIMO, Honda also developed several earlier versions like Honda E and P series robots. In addition to mechanical capabilities, like walking even through stairs, ASIMO had sensing and vision capability. It could recognize moving objects, and exchange gestures–among other capabilities.  

Honda’s R&D team kept growing ASIMO

ASIMO can recognize moving objects, postures, gestures, surrounding environment, sounds, and faces, enabling it to interact with humans. By 2014, Asimo grew up from being an awkward, stumbling toddler and entering adolescence. During the past fourteen years, it grew up with the capacity to serve breakfast and not slam into people in the halls, thanks to the continued R&D efforts of Honda engineers. By that time, they started to work as a competent waiter in a robot café. But it had a bigger dream. In the same year, teenager ASIMO finally became a soccer star, kicking the ball around with the United States president, no less.

ASIMO’s target work areas—service 

Unlike industrial robots, primarily in the form of arms, Honda targeted to create service jobs for ASIMO. At the age of 14, it already started working in a café as a waiter. The ultimate target place to work was at the nursing homes for taking care of growing elderly. Unfortunately, ASIMO could not offer a human touch, feel, and warmth to them. Although ASIMO had a human shape and also could walk like a human, it did not have many innate abilities of humans. Among some of the limitations, it did not have tender fingers with a rich capability to feel the touch. It could not hold arms with warmth, as the hand was not flexible enough. Due to such limitations, it could not precisely coordinate movements of the fingers of one or both hands to grasp, manipulate objects. It did not also have skin with millions of receptors. 

Among many other inabilities, ASIMO was not quick enough to respond (with the hand, finger, or foot) to a signal (sound, light, picture) when it appears. As a matter of fact, ASIMO did not have more or less any of the 52 major innate abilities of humans. Among other limitations, ASIMO could not concentrate on listening to specific messages amid surrounding conversations. Subsequently, ASIMO failed to qualify for the job of offering caregiving service. Of course, Honda engineers offered some sensing capabilities. Nevertheless, they were highly primitive in comparison to humans. Consequentially, ASIMO not only failed to get nursing jobs but also it could not qualify for many other target service jobs.   

Uprising of Robots in Manufacturing 

Contrary to ASIMO’s disqualification for getting service jobs, its cousins are doing well in the workplace. ASIMO’s cousins work in factories, performing industrial jobs. They are called industrial robots. Across the world, industrial robots are experiencing accelerated penetration. According to the Economist analysis, the number of robots in use worldwide increased threefold over the past two decades. According to the International Federation of Robotics, the global operational stock of robots rose to 2.4 million units. In addition to it, Oxford Economics estimates that by 2030, China alone will have more than 14 million robots in work. Such uprising of industrial robots raises a question: what was wrong with ASIMO? In contrary to service delivery, robots performing manufacturing tasks do not require most of the human-like innate capabilities. For example, instead of a tender hand full of sensors, they need robust fingers that do not wear out while welding metal pieces.   

Robots’ capability for delivering service is shaken with the news: Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle 

As opposed to performing dull, dirty, and dangerous jobs repeatedly with a high level of accuracy, service robots need to be flexible and adaptable in performing tasks, often with a soft touch. In fact, they need to rely on human-like innate abilities in delivering services, which require high-level interactions with recipient humans, and also objects. For example, serving the elderly with help for moving in and out of beds, baths, wheelchairs, or automobiles and dressing and grooming needs many human-like innate abilities. Some of them are near and far vision, arm-hand steadiness, and inductive reasoning. To perform even a simple task, robots in service will require many of such abilities. Moreover, it has been found that technologically it’s quite difficult, perhaps not impossible, to build such abilities in machines.  Possibly, due to such technological complexities, Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle prematurely.  

ASIMO bows out—robots face roadblock to penetrate in service  

Over more than 30 years, Honda engineers pursued a relentless journey to build human-like capability in ASIMO. On the one hand, Honda is a technology-rich company. On the other hand, ASIMO was a national pride of Japan. Indeed, an icon of technological superiority. Moreover, the Japanese are known for their desire to pursue a relentless journey of perfection. Furthermore, Honda has maintained its position among the top 10 global robotics patent ownership over 2010-2019. Nevertheless, Honda’s R&D team could not build enough abilities to make ASIMO qualify for service jobs.

Consequentially, in 2018, Honda decided to end further R&D to improve ASIMO. In fact, this is the only long-term project which failed to roll out for commercial applications. Honda’s this long journey for building ASIMO to qualify for service carries important lessons indeed. Does it mean that there is a serious roadblock on the way of the uprising of service robots, which we could not foresee?  

Future of Work—does ASIMO’s demise make all predictions wrong? 

Of course, robots have been accelerating progress in taking over manufacturing jobs. On average, the entry of one new robot in a factory leads to a loss of 6 human jobs. According to IFR, in 2018, 422,000 units of robots were shipped globally. Based on these numbers, we lost more or less 2.5 million jobs to robots in 2018 alone. At this rate, we will likely lose 25 million jobs by 2030. What are the underlying factors affecting the growth trend? Will the growth be linear, or exponential? Is there a chance that growth might flatten out? Moreover, will we experience similar growth or robot penetration and job loss in the service sector? Many of the predictions are based on the assumption that robots would replicate the past and ongoing industrial success in the service sector. 

In fact, many of us anticipated that humanoids like ASIMO will grow to power a creative wave of destruction in the service sector. In retrospect, we made a mistake in assessing the technological complexity in building human-like innate abilities in humanoids. Such abilities are vital for robots to take over major categories of service jobs. As service constitutes more than 70 percent of global GDP, robots’ progression in taking over an increasing number of jobs from humans faces questions. Honda’s ASIMO ends lifecycle is more than a piece of simple news. Perhaps, it tells that robots face roadblocks to take over positions in the service sector. Subsequently, it contributes further to the uncertainty about the future of work.

Related Articles:

Job Polarization – technology shaping future of work

Future of Work – persistent uncertainty

Future of Work from Home – Robotic process automation takes over

Dull Jobs for Human—Dead Robots Redefine Future of Work

Future of Work for Humanoid

Creative Destruction Shapes Future of Work
Future of Work for Sophia Robot—does it offer a misleading impression?
Enlighten others

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

You May Also Like

Underlying theories and data indicate that job polarisation effect is caused due to the ease of automation of data and knowledge centric jobs of educated workforce
View Post
  • 5 min

Job Polarization – technology shaping future of work

Robots taking over jobs for China has become a blessing for preventing factory outmigration and protecting office jobs.
View Post
  • 5 min

Robots Taking Over Jobs – blessing for China?

Skill development should focus on sharpening innate abilities and linking education to real-life problem solving for addressing growing gaps for both hard and soft skills
View Post
  • 6 min

Skill Development – endless upskilling and reskilling

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

Principles

  • Economics of Technology
  • Innovation Economics
  • Technology & Innovation Policy

History & Observations

  • Technology History
  • Innovation History
  • Strategy & Policy in retrospect
  • Entrepreneurs & Innovators
  • Startups & Corporations
  • Patents & Publications
  • Design & Redesign Thinking

About Us

  • Who we are
  • What we deliver
  • Genesis
  • Mission
  • Scope
  • Editorial & Advisory Board
THE WAVES
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Input your search keywords and press Enter.